![]() ![]() I also don't know any long-term problems with using 8MB vs 512MB multipart size, so if there's any counsel available regarding that, I'd appreciate it too. Decreasing the multipart size helps, but it's still only half of what I know our environment can handle. At the smallest size (8MB), we're getting 40Mb/s (5MB/s) upload speeds, but as the Multipart size increases to the default 512MB, the speed decreases to 16Mb/s.Īfter a month+ long dialogue with Synology support, they have acknowledged (to some degree) that our experience of slow upload speeds is a limitation of their software and something that might get fixed in some future update.Īs a sort of last-ditch effort, I'm wondering if anyone else here has experience with slow upload speeds with Hyper Backup and perhaps a way of speeding it up. What's strange is that as we decrease the 'multipart upload part size' the actual upload speeds increase. This is a far cry from the 80Mb/s (10MB/s) we get from Backblazes' web-based speedtest tool or from other tools leveraging their APIs. Unboxed the units, configured them, got some data on there, and tried a test upload to Backblaze and got a paltry 16Mb/s (2MB/s) speeds. We bought a couple of Synology RS1221RP+ units to function mainly as JBoD with the intention of backing them up to Backblaze using Synology Hyper Backup.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |